![]() They may also fear that installing accessible features will be costly, time-consuming, or inconvenient. Organizations responsible for buildings and public spaces may feel that they do not need to worry about making older spaces accessible because the standard does not require them to do so. These legal limitations mean that older buildings and spaces are closed or unwelcoming to people with certain disabilities, including people who: In addition, the Code and Standard only mandate accessibility in buildings and spaces that are new or redeveloped. ![]() The need for a stronger provincial code and standardĪ stronger provincial code and standard would mean that cities need not duplicate each other’s efforts to create accessible public spaces. Toronto’s guidelines include additional provisions for accessible: ![]() Toronto and Brantford outline more accessibility guidelines for places like: However, many cities, such as Toronto, Brantford, and London, have addressed this gap by developing municipal guidelines for accessible public spaces and features including: Visual fire alarms in auditoriums and hallwaysĬurrently, the Code and Standard do not have guidelines for several aspects of structures.Barrier-free paths of travel into and through buildings.Automatic doors and wide doorways at entrances to buildings and common areas. ![]() Ramps, lifts or elevators whenever there are stairs.Similarly, under the Ontario Building Code, all new and redeveloped buildings open to the public, businesses, and apartment buildings must follow accessibility standards. Fixed waiting areas, fixed queuing guides, and service counters.Under the Design of Public Spaces Standard of the AODA, organizations must make new and redeveloped public spaces accessible. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |